A book review by: Keri Marrs Barron
Graduate Student
International Center for Studies in Creativity
Could you imagine a childhood
without playing outdoors? What if the television was the only spark given to
your imagination? Creating images in clouds, dreaming of being rescued by a
super hero or being the next president are all images that might not be created
following this author's ten step process of destroying a child’s
imagination. Esolen, an English
Professor from Providence College, writes the non-fiction book Ten Ways to Destroy the Imagination of your Child, focusing on how
our current society is destroying the imagination of our children. Each chapter concentrates on one of the ten
methods using major themes through our everyday society (the environment,
machines, sex, heroes, patriotism, politics and man & woman). After discussing the method of destruction,
Esolen references examples of literary characters who would not be desired in this non-imaginative society. Then he sarcastically implies
this is the outcome our society desires. Esolen
reviews the nine other methods the same way: society, character, sarcasm.
One of Esolen’s methods of
destruction is titled, “Keep your children indoors as much as possible" or "They
used to call it ‘air’.” The chapter
documents how children are more interested in playing with video games,
televisions, and even cell phones than exploring outside adventures, which provides little to spark the imagination. Society has had a large impact on this
method. Now, more families have both
parents working outside the home and the children are instructed to stay inside
until a parent is home from work. The
day begins with school, where students are instructed to color in the lines,
sit down, go to lunch at this time, do this and do that, all indoors. After school they stay entertained by the
technology boxes (phones, television, video games) until the parent gets home and
then may run off to another conforming event (possibly soccer practice or band practice). The child has no time for fresh air or to just observe the
outdoors.
During the summer months the
imagination is constrained even more as the technology box is the main focus of
entertainment. No school, just time on
their own in a house, no outside time. The concept of being able to walk down
to a park or to a hangout with friends and partake in some crazed adventure is
taken away by a safety concern for the child.
When the opportunity arises to enjoy the outdoors, the child is not
interested in being outdoors, as his stimulation is from the box and not from his
imagination. One book and character that Esolen references by keeping our
children indoors is Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain. Sawyer is a young boy who plays
outdoors on the Mississippi River building his independence in discovering the
outdoors and creating mischief, yet, he also develops his self reliance and
confidence to explore and succeed in the world.
In keeping our children indoors we are defining the imagination by the
box and sheltering the development of confidence and self worth rather than
providing the opportunity to develop their own imagination comparative to Tom
Sawyer.
As a parent, I was sold by the
title and wondered how this book could help me be more aware of the destruction
we are causing to our own children’s imagination and creativity. The book is profound but very true. In trying to protect our children and educate
them to be good students and citizens, we are trampling their creativity and
imagination by teaching them to conform.
After I read the first method, I took my book, laptop and my kids to play
outside to observe nature rather than our inner walls.
A very well researched book, I was
not expecting the author to have referenced examples throughout literature, from
Chopin, Chesterton, and Lewis to the Holy Bible. Written by an English
professor, I should have expected no different but I was a bit bored by the numerous
literary references. In all fairness to
Esolen, I am an implementer (a preference in the Foursight®
creative problem solving analysis). When I read an idea and have evidence, I am
ready to move on to another topic, as opposed to reading several more
references of characters we would be destroying. As a parent and former educator, I was
interested in any suggestions or solutions, to remedy the problem. Unfortunately,
this book did not address solutions.
My one imaginative takeaway could
not have been better said by my three-year-old daughter when she left Sunday
school: “He swallowed me whole, he swallowed me whole.” I thought about what she said for a few
minutes and realized even the Holy Bible utilizes the imagination; she
was singing a song about Jonah being swallowed by the whale. Ironically, Esolen’s final method references
this same story of Jonah and the whale. The
more I thought about the imagination and creativity, the more I continued to wonder why as
a society we are working so hard to conform and eliminate the imagination. For many years, our most well known
innovators such as Albert Einstein, Thomas Edison, Walt Disney, and Steve Jobs were
known for their imagination not their conforming, so why are we so insistent on
conforming? Children need to know that if they think outside the box, or color
outside the lines, they should not be penalized, rather encouraged for their
creativity. Imagination can be restored and we do not need to read about
negative topics like destruction of the imagination.
References
Esolen.A. (2010). Ten
Ways to Destroy the Imagination of your Child.
Wilmington, DE:
Intercollegiate Studies Institute.
About Keri Marrs Barron
Keri Marrs Barron is a current
student in the Master’s program at the International Center for Studies in
Creativity at Buffalo State University.
She is a former administrator in Higher Education. Her positions ranged
from the aspect of Student Services from recruiting, advising, teaching and
directing Student Activities. Her
current full time position and hobbies are caring for her family and finishing
her degree. Marrs Barron resides in La
Porte, Indiana with her husband, 3 sons and 1 daughter.
No comments:
Post a Comment